点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
宁夏回族自治区政协十二届一次会议在银川开幕******
中新网银川1月12日电 (记者 杨迪)1月12日上午，中国人民政治协商会议第十二届宁夏回族自治区委员会第一次会议在银川开幕，新一届宁夏回族自治区政协委员们心怀良策、共聚一堂。
会议应出席委员418人，实到367人，符合规定人数。
十一届宁夏回族自治区政协主席崔波代表宁夏回族自治区政协十一届常委会，向大会作宁夏回族自治区政协十一届常委会工作报告。
宁夏回族自治区政协十二届一次会议在银川开幕。 钱友辉 摄崔波说，2022年是党和国家历史上具有里程碑意义的一年。中共二十大胜利召开，吹响了全面建设社会主义现代化国家、全面推进中华民族伟大复兴的奋进号角。宁夏召开第十三次党代会，开启了全面建设社会主义现代化美丽新宁夏的新征程。一年来，宁夏回族自治区政协及其常委会坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，深入学习宣传贯彻中共二十大精神，全面贯彻落实宁夏回族自治区第十三次党代会决策部署，在全国政协的有力指导和宁夏回族自治区党委的坚强领导下，充分发挥专门协商机构作用，团结引导政协委员和各族各界人士聚焦中心履职尽责，高质量完成年度协商计划，全面深入做好总结，扎实开展“制度落实年”活动，届末之年成为了奋进之年、收获之年。
崔波说，过去五年，是宁夏政协事业开拓奋进、创新发展的五年。中共中央高度重视人民政协事业发展，首次召开中央政协工作会议，宁夏回族自治区党委大力支持政协工作，宁夏回族自治区政协认真贯彻落实中央决策部署及宁夏回族自治区党委工作要求，在继承中发展、在发展中创新，做了一系列既打基础利长远，又具实效性开创性的工作，展现了新面貌、干出了新样子。五年来，常委会扎实有效推进政协系统党的建设，持续深入加强作风和纪律建设，推动政协更好成为坚持和加强党对各项工作领导的重要阵地。坚持把加强思想政治引领、广泛凝聚共识融入各项履职活动中，切实做到建言成果、思想收获一体设计、一体实现。精心选定协商内容，不断丰富协商形式，着力提升协商质量，注重培育协商文化，推动协商履职成效更加明显。着力在强化委员责任担当、提高机关干部能力素质上下功夫，不断夯实履职基础、强化履职能力、提升履职实效。坚持以改革创新精神推动政协理论创新、制度创新、工作创新，走出了坚实的履职脚步。
崔波在报告中对今后工作提出建议。他说，要在推进协商民主广泛多层制度化发展上探索创新；在坚持发扬民主和增进团结相互贯通上积极实践；在提高深度协商互动、意见充分表达、广泛凝聚共识上持续用力；在更好履行职能、拓宽联系渠道上求实求新；在不断提出真正解决问题的新理念新思路新办法上寻求突破。
会议听取宁夏回族自治区政协十一届委员会常务委员会关于提案工作情况的报告，通过宁夏回族自治区政协十二届一次会议提案审查委员会名单。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)