大发彩票手机版APP_新版APP下载-安全购彩

来源：大发彩票技巧2024-01-18 17:48

首届中国（海南）东坡文化旅游大会将于2月举办******

　　中新网海口1月11日电 (记者张茜翼)记者从11日举行的新闻发布会获悉，首届中国(海南)东坡文化旅游大会将于2月中下旬举办。本届东坡大会将通过多种活动形式，弘扬东坡文化，展现苏东坡的家国情怀、豁达人生、为民意识和文学成就。

　　海南省旅游和文化广电体育厅副厅长刘成表示，苏东坡在琼三年，他丰富的文学创作，豁达、执着的为人，接近民众、关心民疾的事迹，对琼崖文化教育有着深远的影响，也留下极其丰富、宝贵的文化文物资源。

　　本届大会的主题为“弘扬东坡文化，助力海南自贸港文化旅游建设”，采取“线上+线下”结合方式，将论坛、展览、演出、美食文化体验活动、文创大赛等活动有机结合，打造独具海南特色的东坡文化体验。

　　发布会介绍，开幕式将以“大型音舞诗画‘不老东坡’”为题，包括《遇见东坡》《明月几时有》《一蓑烟雨任平生》《我本海南民》《不老东坡》五个章节。

　　大会期间将举办首届东坡文化国际高端论坛，议题涉及苏轼民本思想研究、苏轼法治思想研究、苏轼生活艺术研究、东坡文化在海南自贸港建设中的创造性转化研究等。

　　东坡文创产品设计大赛及作品展览与苏东坡主题文物展两大精品展览将在此间举行。其中，苏东坡主题文物展将由海南省博物馆与故宫博物院合作，计划于2023年10月在海南省博物馆展出。该展览以苏东坡生平文物、苏东坡在海南相关历史遗迹、桄榔庵考古发掘出土文物等为重点展示内容，以文物、史料和多媒体载体，系统呈现苏轼三年居琼期间，创造并留下的丰富历史文化资源。

　　此外，大会还将举办以东坡文化为主题的精品剧目展演，将富有古典色彩的中国传统美学意趣与时代概念相结合，融入海南特色元素，展现东坡文化魅力。

　　东坡美食文化荟以“美食美刻知味东坡”为主题，邀请省内外东坡旅居城市携代表性东坡美食参与，集中展示东坡名宴，增进区域经济文化交流与合作，擦亮“琼式美味”城市名片。

　　东坡文化古迹研学游活动依托海南文旅资源，打造东坡文化古迹研学之旅。苏东坡诗酒文化鉴赏游园会包括东坡诗词唱诗大赛、苏东坡诗酒文化鉴赏游园会系列活动，唱响东坡经典诗词，感受宋代古风文化意境。

　　刘成说，海南将深入挖掘东坡文学创作、民本思想、家教家风、家国情怀、生活艺术思想等东坡文化的丰富元素，不断探索以民众喜闻乐见的形式传承和弘扬东坡文化，推动苏学研究与旅游、餐饮、文创、研学等产业的融合发展。(完)

大发彩票手机版APP

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.